While skimming through the many bulletins on Myspace, I found one with this site linked in it, so I clicked on it to see what it was. What I found was.. Well, let's say interesting to keep it simple more or less.
http://www.demonbaby.com/blog/There at that site, is some of the most radical things you could think of, politically, and religiously. The author of the blogs himself is an atheist so his argument naturally is against religion, of all sorts. He even has an article about Scientology, ridiculing it and the ideas of religion in general in it. However, the article I found most interesting was one that contained a Museum for Creationist, and this author's opinions on the Church (It's the first story listed.)
Now, whether you're Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, Taoist, Agnostic, or Atheist, you have to agree that the things both sides have to offer are some of the most radical indoctrinations that could be speculated.
The museum's goal, is apparently to discredit the theory of evolution and make the idea of Creationism factual. They spit out these ideas to the fragile minds of Children, as the author would describe. Just some of the things this museum has to offer as
fact are that the Bible is the truth of all in the Universe (That part is not a problem, as it is a principle held by Christianity,) the ideas of basic sinning and then.. A little bit of alteration of the time line, by using what parts of Science it wants too. For example, it explains that fossils were the result of the Great Flood Noah built a ship for. The water buried the fossils under layers of water. It also says that the world is a small 6,000 years old, and that humans lived with the dinosaurs. To support that Jurassic claim, it uses
myths of dragons, the fact that crocodiles lived with dinosaurs, and other things among that.
now, I could continue to speak about other things on how this museum is trying to take a change on time, but I need to change to how biased this atheist is.
Right from the beginning, you can see his bias. The captions on every photo, the way he writes, mentioning "Right Wing Slogans." No, he's not only religiously biased, but politically as well. He makes very logical arguments against what the museum has to offer. However, it seems that everything that Is God, he seems to put into question. I can't, at this moment pull up the specifics on him, so I'd recommend reading the article to see how radical he is, and how radical the museum is. It contains some language that could have probably done without, but either way this is one of the most radical things I've ever seen.
Personal Thoughts:
It's apparent to me this museum is on a mission of interpretation of the Bible in a literal fashion.
Literally the Earth was made in 6 days, from God's hands. Because of that literal interpretation, they have to find a way to explain everything, using Science and God in a manner so choosy, that it takes the small details to make logic and then uses Supernatural to fill in where it won't fit. The author isn't a complete idiot, but his bias is something that couldn't be trusted.
Instead, I think it'd be much easier, if the museum used a less literal interpretation of the Bible. Perhaps, maybe... The Earth was formed after 6 Billion Years? Perhaps, Adam could be the metaphor for the Human Race? The Humans Named the animals, the Humans gave into the sinning? I don't know. All I can say is that, the two focuses in the given argument are radical. If you're the type of person who takes the literal interpretation of the Bible, there's nothing wrong with that. It's when it's presented as fact as the museum does, given that it is a place for True Believers. That is something the Atheist author refused to understand, the idea that it is for those who are Christian and believe that idea. That doesn't change that either are radical loonies though.
Personally, I think Agnostic is the way to go..
What are your opinions on that?